STRASSE 5 SCHIENE [170/60ZR17 M/C 72W TL] Reifen für Straße 5 Schi

I'm running ROAD5 TRAIL on my ZrX1100, not DP, NAKED. "TRAIL. But I don't feel any disturbance.
When the ROAD5 was released, the ZrXRearOEMSize 170/60-17 was not in the lineup. Even so, I wanted to try the ROAD5, so I put on the Rear160/60-17 first. I also got to know the great feeling of security in wet condition.
Because 170/60-17 of TRAIL was Lineup when the Front of the 1st pc reached Life, this time I put on this TRAIL. From the name, I was worried that it might be for Dual PerPass type model or Dry grip might be low. I was worried that the Dry grip might be low, but I did not feel any dissatisfaction or hindrance in Touring or WindingLevel. I have already run more than 8,000km, but there is no uneven wear and the life seems to be excellent. (Life of the front is too short, no good)
What is the difference between ROAD5 Standard and TRAIL? I don't know, but the TRAILSpec. but the rare size = 170/60-17 of ZrX1100Rear was saved. If it wears out, I will put them on next time.Please Michelin to improve FrontLife.

The 170/60Zr17 is used on the 160/70Zr17 TDM.
The reason. "Trail. I was interested in that.

That said, before this, I was using an unmarked ROAD5 (160/70Zr17 in the proper size) and it performed great.
Unfortunately, I punctured it with a flourish at the 6000km point, but I wonder what this would do with Trail? I bought it because of the question.

ROAD 5 is "Trail. When "Muji When GT. There is a difference between the two, but the manufacturer's website doesn't specifically state the difference...
Thanks, I found out that the Trail is for Adventure vehicles and the GT is for heavy duty Tourers, but wouldn't it be more durable for Adventure vehicles?
Isn't that Wallet-friendly? There was also the prospect of

Also, the size will increase by one size (within the range of the manufacturer's recommended Rim width) and the round shape will become more pointy, which will make it easier to fall down and more lightly handle. There was also the hope that
There is no 160 width setting for Trail.

But the results were all a failure.
First of all, Size up is not good.
I thought the area around the center was going to be pointy, but it wasn't. It was just a strange shape that the SIDE was rolled up.
It's as if the more I lay down, the lighter I get.
Large Like the old Yokohama Getter 003...
Moreover, the area around the Center seems to have flattened slightly, and the area around the upright is sleepy.
I didn't think I'd end up like this just because I went greedy and raised the size by one size. (´・ω・`)

However, the Tire itself is still a great performer, just not the right size.
Dry grip is outstanding and the prized wet grip is perfect.
Touring tires don't have as much wet grip as this one, do they?
Life is also long, about 2.5 part mountain left after 6000km.
You can use it for about 8,000km.

Just compare it to the unmarked. It's the Trail. I didn't notice any difference between the two.
It doesn't feel like the stiffness is up, and the Compound doesn't seem stiff.
Is it really any different?

One last weakness.
This Tire has a lot of drains in the middle, which will wear out with Stages.
Even if it is worn out with Stages, no problem, especially if it is clear.
No decoration bumpiness.
Except on a rainy day.
In my case, the point in question is worn out with Stages in the direction of deceleration, but when I accelerate on a rainy day with Tire reduced and worn out with Stages, the with Stages tumbles backwards and slides quite easily.
I was quite surprised the first time I skied on it, as I had great faith in the unbeatable Wet grip until then.
My eyeballs popped out a little bit as it was raining Cornering and Timing trying to accelerate.

That said, it only happened because I opened it up so much in the rain that it was impossible for a normal Tire to do so, and that wouldn't have happened if I drove more carefully like it was a rainy day.
If you are an Adventure type person, there is no question that this is a Recommendation.